If abolishing slavery was truly the intent of the North in the 1850’s, why did abolitionists not promote a peaceful solution and initiatives that would compensate slaveholders as the British had done ten years earlier? But being appalled by the slaughter and knowing full well their own responsibility for the American conflict, along with New England slave traders, why didn’t the British intervene with a practical solution to the African slavery caused by their own colonial labor policies and eventually causing the deaths of a million Americans?
Bernhard Thuersam, Director Cape Fear Historical Institute www.cfhi.net
British Opinion on the War Against Independence:
“The popular verdict in England was that “the struggle between North and South was a contest for political power and ascendancy, and that in reference to slavery the North discarded or ignored all practical measures for emancipation, and confined their operations to oratory, preaching, sentimental poems, fiction and invective.”
The opinions of the responsible statesmen of Great Britain may be stated in the following extract from a speech delivered by Earl Russell at Newcastle on the 14th of October, 1861: --“We now see the two parties (in the United States) contending together, not upon the slavery question, though that I believe was probably the original cause of the quarrel, not contending with respect to free trade and [tariff] protection, but contending, as so many States in the Old World have contended, the one side for empire, and the other for independence.”
The official view expressed in the course of a speech by Earl Russell in the House of Lords, 9th of June 1864. He said : --“It is dreadful to think that hundreds of thousands of men are being slaughtered for the purpose of preventing the Southern States from acting on those very principles of independence which, in 1776, were asserted by the whole of America against this country.
Only a few years ago the Americans were in the habit of celebrating the promulgation of the Declaration of Independence, and some eminent friends of mine never failed to make eloquent and stirring orations on those occasions. I wish, while they kept up a useless ceremony (for the present generation of Englishmen are not responsible for the War of Independence), they had inculcated on their own minds that they should not go to war with four millions, five millions, or six millions of their countrymen who want to put the principles of 1776 into operation as regards themselves.”
The Secret Service of the Confederate States in Europe, James D. Bulloch, Sagamore Press, 1959, pp. 311-312, 313-314)
